Raccolta degli articoli scientifici e ricerche nel campo della Control-Mastery Theory.
According to Control-Mastery Theory, patients attend therapy with an unconscious plan to achieve adaptive goals and disprove their pathogenic beliefs. One important way patients work to disconfirm these beliefs is by testing them. Moreover, patients coach their therapists on what they need at different times during their treatment. The aim of this study is to expand the results of previous studies suggesting that therapists’ responses that support patients’plan predict progress. We investigated whether therapists’ ability to pass patients’ tests correlated with patients’ improvement in the following session and whether their ability to follow patients’ coaches correlated with immediate improvement. Transcriptions of 98 sessions from six brief psychodynamic psychotherapies wer assessed by 12 independent raters. The patients’ plans were formulated, and tests and coaching communications were identified. The accuracy of the therapist’s responses to these tests and coaches was rated, and the impact of the therapist’s interventions on the patient’s following communication was measured. The results showed that when a therapist’s intervention passes a patient’s tests, patients show signs of improvement both immediately and in the following session, and when therapists follow patients’ coaches, patients show signs of immediate improvement. The clinical implications and limitations of the findings are discussed.
According to Control-Mastery Theory (CMT)—a cognitive-dynamic relational theory of mental functioning, psychopathology, and psychotherapy—patients come to therapy with an unconscious plan to disprove their pathogenic beliefs and achieve adaptive goals. One of the primary ways patients work to disconfirm their pathogenic beliefs is by testing them within the therapeutic relationship. The present study aimed to replicate and expand the results of previous studies suggesting that therapists’ responses that disconfirmed patient’s pathogenic beliefs were predictive of patients’ within-session progress. Moreover, we wanted to investigate whether these interventions correlated with the therapeutic alliance. Transcriptions of 81 sessions from five brief psychodynamic psychotherapies were assessed by 11 independent raters. For each case, the patient’s plan was formulated and tests identified, the accuracy of the therapist’s responses to these tests was rated, and the impact of the therapist’s interventions on the patient’s subsequent communications and their relationship with the therapeutic alliance was measured. The results supported the central hypothesis of the CMT that when the therapist’s interventions passed the patient’s tests, the patient showed signs of improvement. Moreover, the ability of the therapist to pass the patient’s tests correlated with the therapeutic alliance. The clinical implications and the limitations of these findings are discussed, together with the relevance of a good case formulation for clinicians’ optimal responsiveness.
The aim of this paper is to empirically assess the reliability of the plan formulation method for couples, a procedure for formulating the case, planning, and monitoring the couple therapies according to control-mastery theory. We hypothesized that when couples are looking for couple therapy, they have an unconscious couple’s plan for the therapy, which includes the couple’s goals; the pathogenic beliefs that the partners want to disprove; the traumas from which these beliefs originated and that the partners want to master; the vicious relational circles that make the couple suffer and that the couple wants to break; the virtuous relational circles that are expressions of the couple’s resources and that the couple wants to fuel; and the relational insights that may help the couple get better. Our study involved 15 couples treated by four experienced therapists. Four raters independently formulated each couple’s plan based on the first three sessions following a standard procedure, and we calculated the intraclass correlation for pooled judges’ ratings. For a subsample of three couples—who before and after treatment had completed the dyadic adjustment scale (DAS) and the outcome questionnaire-45.2 (OQ-45.2)—the compatibility of the therapists’ interventions with the couples’ and partners’ plans was assessed. The relationship between the ratings of compatibility, DAS and OQ-45.2, was assessed. The results showed excellent interjudge reliability for each couple’s plan formulation (average ICC=0.82), attesting to the validity of the procedure; and preliminary data on the therapeutic process suggested that therapists’ interventions compatible with couple’s plans could help partners achieve good outcomes.
The aim of this paper is to show the evolution of the psychoanalytic conception of fantasy/phantasy from a psychic activity aimed at denying reality and/or fulfilling frustrated wishes to a tool useful for adapting to reality. We will then review some recent findings of empirical research on imagination and mental simulation showing how these activities, and mind wandering in general, is expression of the constant effort of the psyche to set and pursue adaptive goals, to elaborate and test plans, and to master and solve problems and traumas. Finally, we will show how these empirical data are consistent with the conception of fantasy proposed by the control-mastery theory (CMT; Gazzillo, 2016; Silberschatz, 2005; Weiss, 1993), an integrated cognitive-dynamic relational theory of psychic functioning, psychopathology, and psychotherapy developed and tested in the last 40 years by the San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group.
In the classical psychoanalytic tradition, the patient is seen as unconsciously governed by forces that are at odds with the healing process. But over the years, the concept of resistance against change has been subjected to modifications, and the patient’s contribution to the therapeutic relationship has come to be seen as more oriented to a conscious and unconscious collaboration with the clinician. This article aims to explore a new way of understanding how progress in psychotherapy is achieved and to reframe the therapeutic relationship from the point of view of Control-Mastery Theory (CMT). According to CMT, people are motivated to achieve adaptive goals, to master their traumas, and to feel better; to this purpose, patients unconsciously assume proactive roles in the therapeutic process. Indeed, they work during therapy to disprove their pathogenic beliefs, testing them in the therapeutic relationship, and helping the therapist through coaching behaviors, attitudes, and communications aimed at providing helpful information to understand the components of their own unconscious plan.
A good enough theory of psychological functioning and development, and of how psychotherapy works, should take into account recent scientific developments about emotional, motivational, and cognitive functioning. They show how human beings are “wired” to adapt to reality and share a set of evolutionary-based emotions, motivations and skills that are shaped by the cognitive-affective structures (schemas) developed on the basis of the emotionally relevant experiences, in particular of the first years of life. Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969, 1973, 1980) represents the first real attempt in this direction, although the clinical implications of this theory are still fragmented and not specific enough. We think that control mastery theory (CMT; Weiss, 1993) could be useful for integrating attachment, psychodynamic, and cognitive-evolutionary thinking. Such an integrated model is based on the centrality of adaptation, sense of safety, and real experiences; on the central role of inner representations/beliefs/schemas in linking adverse developmental experiences and attentional strategies, perception organization, emotional reactions, behavior, and psychopathology; and on the necessity to modify this relational knowledge in order to help patients get better. To explore the possible integration between attachment theory and CMT, we will focus on a specific topic, the disorganization of attachment and its psychopathological consequences, and we will illustrate the implications of this integration with a brief clinical example. We chose to focus on attachment disorganization because it is the attachment category more consistently related to psychopathology.
This article proposes an adaptation to couple therapy of the Plan Formulation Method, an empirically validated and clinically useful assessment procedure for planning case-specific psychotherapy interventions. According to Control-Mastery Theory (CMT), individuals who seek psychotherapy have an unconscious plan, which comprises goals, obstructions, tests, traumas, and insights. The Plan Formulation Method was developed to reliably formulate individual psychotherapy cases. To apply this method to couples therapy, we have added two components: dysfunctional relationship patterns (vicious relational circles) and resources (virtuous relational circles). Each component will be explained with the help of a clinical case. We discuss the implication of the use of the Plan Formulation Method for couples and compare some of the tenets of CMT applied to couples with the main approaches to couple therapy.
The aim of this article is to introduce the reader to how control-mastery theory (CMT; Gazzillo, 2016; Silberschatz, 2005; Weiss, 1993), an integrative relational cognitive-dynamic theory of mental functioning, psychopathology, and psychotherapeutic process, understands traumas, their consequences, and their mastery. In the first part of this article, we will present an overview of the debate about the definition of trauma within the different editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Then, we will focus on the concept of complex traumas and on their consequences on mental health. Finally, we will discuss how CMT conceptualizes traumas and their pathological consequences. We will stress in particular how, according to CMT, in order for a painful experience to become a trauma, its victim has to come to believe that s/he caused it in the attempt to pursue a healthy and adaptive goal. In order to master traumas and disprove the pathogenic beliefs developed from them, people attempt to reexperience situations similar to the traumatic ones in safer conditions while giving them happier endings.
The aim of this paper is to describe and discuss the models of the process of change in psychotherapy developed by the Boston Change Process Study Group (2010), and by the San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group (Gazzillo, 2016; Silberschatz, 2005; Weiss, 1993; Weiss, Sampson, & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group, 1986). The first model is centered on change in implicit relational knowledge and describes the process of change as being composed of “moving along” phases interspersed by “now moments” that can become “moments of meeting” if the clinician is to give authentic and specifically fitted responses. A moment of meeting opens up space for a change in the implicit relational knowledge of the patient. The second model is centered on the idea that patients come to therapy with an unconscious plan to master traumas, pursue healthy and adaptive goals, and disprove their pathogenic beliefs, and points to how patients test their pathogenic beliefs in the relationship with the therapist, coaching the therapist about what they need. Passing patients’ tests means helping them disconfirm or undermine pathogenic beliefs that hopefully will lead to disproving them. This second model focuses on the subjective meaning of the therapeutic process as seen from the perspective of the patient. We will also try to show, using clinical examples, how these two models can be integrated and how their integration may give us a more comprehensive, tridimensional vision of the therapeutic process.
Recent studies on moral development suggest the existence of a set of innate abilities which foster moral functioning. From a very early age on, children seem to show ability for moral discernment, together with emotions and pro-social motivations based on an innate propensity to empathize with people in difficulty and respect equity; moreover, they tend to feel guilty when they believe that they transgressed some basic “moral principles”. Evolutionary studies suggest that human morality stems from group selection. During its evolutionary history, human species met socioecological conditions that made group selection the dominant evolutionary force, thus favouring the development of cognitive abilities, emotions, and motivations essential for cooperation within groups. Also according to the CMT morality arises from the human need to preserve connectedness with other people - family members above all (attachment) - and the propensity to make them feel good (care). In sum, starting from an innate moral draft which is pre-reflexive and evolutionarily founded, morality and guilt would then be shaped by the emotionally relevant experiences people go through within their family and cultural environment.
